| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
The place to discuss rules, clarifications, bannings and erratta.
| Page 4 of 4 (56 messages) | « First page... 2 3 4 |
Khudzlin said:
@Bomb: Catelyn Stark (LoW) doesn't have a response, but a "Challenges" action.
Right, that is what I was correcting in the post following it.
The "card originating from hand" thing is sort of bugging me. There are no "play response" from non-Event cards, are there? I may be furthermore incorrect in that last post because those cards are "put into play" by triggering their response. Maybe that is what Little and Less intended to fend off.
Without Signature
Besides, there are "put into play" effects from the discard and dead piles, so the statement about being only from hand is invalid.
Without Signature
Oh for gods sake…the words "play" "initiate" "trigger" responses are used interchangeably all through the rules and FAQ.
5) Responses
After any passive abilities triggered as a result of the action or save/cancel response are resolved, players may now play normal responses in clockwise order (starting with the player to the left of the player who initiated the action). As described above, a player may trigger normal responses for any opportunity that has occurred at any time during this Action Window - either spurred from the action itself, or spurred from other responses, or passive abilities, resolved previously during the Action Window.
“Does it disturb anyone else that "The Los Angeles Angels" baseball team translates directly to "The The Angels Angels?” —Neil Degrasse Tyson
Bloomington/Normal Gaming: www.meetup.com/bn-bareg
"Our knees do not bend easily" said Ser Arthur Dayne.
"As a young boy, I was taught in high school that hacking was cool." - Kevin Mitnick
Snowfrost, could you give us the full text of the question you sent to FFG and the answer you received, please?
Without Signature
Wow… talk about chopping the utility of the card off at the balls. I was actually hoping we'd see it shake up the meta a bit, but I'd be hard pressed to justify this into any event slot when if all you are trying to do is cancel events there are cards that already do that and have the added benefit of not signalling to your opponent what's going on beforehand and wasting your opponent's card as well.
Without Signature
Reldan said:
Exactly – why would you use this in a joust game at all instead of a Paper Shield, for example? In a melee where the probability of multiple responses being played, it might be more useful. But still, this card just lost all it's excitement.
You frakking cylon!
Ok, so I get that now this event means you can't play any events or other types of responses from hand (like jumping Drogo), but what about Bloodrider? They are a put-into-play effect that we know is different than "play." Can I still trigger them if this event has already been played?
Without Signature
Hi all,
A little confused on the exact use of this card. Does this stop anything coming out of your hand that is basically triggered, e.g. Responses, Any Phase, Challenges, etc, or does it only stop cards that use the term Response?
Also, I am not always clear on timing but can you play this card in the Plot phase before the Plots have been chosen, and then chose Valar, and stop Narrow Escape from being played?
Cheers,
Mooch
Slothgodfather said:
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'
- Dave Berry
Mooch68 said:
Mooch68 said:
The card's effect is itself a Response. So you need a (standard) Response opportunity in order to play it. You can't just toss it on the table before plots and say "here you go."
However, since the text says it can Respond to anything, you can always play it in response to the phase starting.
There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'
- Dave Berry
| Page 4 of 4 (56 messages) | « First page... 2 3 4 |
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS