Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay
A Roleplaying game of perilous adventure!
Moderator: FFG DanielCffgjafferFFGMarkGeckoThe Spaniardynnen Topics: 2772 | Posts: 29988
No Halflings!
Published on 13 August 2009 - 09:08:10
Page 2 of 3 (41 messages) « First page... 1 2 3 ...Last page »
Reply #16 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:00:22

Anonymus said:

The squats and halfling does'nt even play in the same league. squats was dropped after 1st ed 40k. halflings are still around in 7th edition WHF. ;) So sorry.

Space Dwarves with machine guns are still cooler than fat hobbits with slings.

I'm sorry, but my argument wins.

Reply #17 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:01:59
2
19

 

Necrozius said:

 

Anonymus said:

 

Yes lets also kill of other parts of the backround, like the dark elves. What a load of pansies!  For a personal reason of course.

 

 

They did it with Squats, I don't see why they can't just do the same with hobbits- er oops I mean halflings.

I think that it's a good thing to free the setting from the shackles of Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés.

 

 

 

We should probably get rid of the orcs, goblins, trolls, elves, dwarfs, dragons, and ogres too while we're at it. Or are we only getting rid of the Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés YOU don't like?

 

However, you'd be thoroughly mistaken if you think halflings are actually being removed from Warhammer. They are still in the Empire Army book printed by GW and it is only they that can remove elements from the background.

 

Hellebore

Humanity's Insignificance pales in comparison to its Ego. Sir Rumplestiltskin

The capacity to think does not assign importance to your thoughts, it merely indicates you can. Sir Rumplestiltskin

Reply #18 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:02:06

Which argument? Maybe you should  elaborate instead of throwing around wierd comments?

=][= Without signature

Reply #19 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:05:52

Hellebore said:

We should probably get rid of the orcs, goblins, trolls, elves, dwarfs, dragons, and ogres too while we're at it. Or are we only getting rid of the Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés YOU don't like?

However, you'd be thoroughly mistaken if you think halflings are actually being removed from Warhammer. They are still in the Empire Army book printed by GW and it is only they that can remove elements from the background.

Come to think of it, I don't really like Orcs in Warhammer. Born from fungus? Ha ha ha ha.

The Orcs in World of Warcraft make much  more sense. The ones in Harry Potter too.

Reply #20 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:09:14
2
19

Necrozius said:

Hellebore said:

 

We should probably get rid of the orcs, goblins, trolls, elves, dwarfs, dragons, and ogres too while we're at it. Or are we only getting rid of the Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés YOU don't like?

However, you'd be thoroughly mistaken if you think halflings are actually being removed from Warhammer. They are still in the Empire Army book printed by GW and it is only they that can remove elements from the background.

 

 

Come to think of it, I don't really like Orcs in Warhammer. Born from fungus? Ha ha ha ha.

The Orcs in World of Warcraft make much  more sense. The ones in Harry Potter too.

 

Lol, the woe is me misunderstood green barbarians? Awesome. Painting some human barbarian tribes green and enslaving them to daemons makes them very interesting.

 

The only reason the orc exists in settings like WoW and D&D is to create a 'human' that it's 'ok' to kill. They are just tribal ugly humans. At least Warhammer's orcs are a little more different than that. They are their own race with their own mindset. Alien rather than misunderstood.

 

Hellebore

Humanity's Insignificance pales in comparison to its Ego. Sir Rumplestiltskin

The capacity to think does not assign importance to your thoughts, it merely indicates you can. Sir Rumplestiltskin

Reply #21 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:09:31

Necrozius said:

Hellebore said:

 

We should probably get rid of the orcs, goblins, trolls, elves, dwarfs, dragons, and ogres too while we're at it. Or are we only getting rid of the Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés YOU don't like?

However, you'd be thoroughly mistaken if you think halflings are actually being removed from Warhammer. They are still in the Empire Army book printed by GW and it is only they that can remove elements from the background.

 

 

Come to think of it, I don't really like Orcs in Warhammer. Born from fungus? Ha ha ha ha.

The Orcs in World of Warcraft make much  more sense. The ones in Harry Potter too.

Necrozius said:

Hellebore said:

 

We should probably get rid of the orcs, goblins, trolls, elves, dwarfs, dragons, and ogres too while we're at it. Or are we only getting rid of the Tolkien-esque fantasy clichés YOU don't like?

However, you'd be thoroughly mistaken if you think halflings are actually being removed from Warhammer. They are still in the Empire Army book printed by GW and it is only they that can remove elements from the background.

 

 

Come to think of it, I don't really like Orcs in Warhammer. Born from fungus? Ha ha ha ha.

The Orcs in World of Warcraft make much  more sense. The ones in Harry Potter too.

 

In the end, it is still more original. hahaha

=][= Without signature

Reply #22 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:11:05

Hellebore said:

 

Lol, the woe is me misunderstood green barbarians? Awesome. Painting some human barbarian tribes green and enslaving them to daemons makes them very interesting.

 

The only reason the orc exists in settings like WoW and D&D is to create a 'human' that it's 'ok' to kill. They are just tribal ugly humans. At least Warhammer's orcs are a little more different than that. They are their own race with their own mindset. Alien rather than misunderstood.

 

Hellebore

Orcs have a mindset?

Reply #23 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:11:54
2
19

Mayhap you're dislike of them has prevented you actually reading anything about them.

 

Hellebore

Humanity's Insignificance pales in comparison to its Ego. Sir Rumplestiltskin

The capacity to think does not assign importance to your thoughts, it merely indicates you can. Sir Rumplestiltskin

Reply #24 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:14:28

Er sorry- I'm actually just trolling you. I couldn't care less about orcs or halflings.

Reply #25 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:47:24
0
0

No Haflings? Can't understand that. Personally i'm not a great halfling fan, but in my group and most groups i know (real life and internet) they are very popular player races. Normally every group has an halfling-PC.

On the other hand most groups i know, have no elf characters. They are considered as to high-fantasy and are very seldom in the setting.

Don't understand FFG. For me it look that they will "crash WFRP 3rd on the wall".

Without signature

Reply #26 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 13:52:13

Elves, who are supposed to be rare to extremely rare in the empire gets two choises... Happy days. Maybe we can soon play as saurus and skink in the empire to?

=][= Without signature

Reply #27 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 14:26:43

What I dont get is why Wood Elves, they are the most insular isolationists in the Warhammer world and that is in a world of insular isolationists. If I was running a game (of any edition) I would always ban charcters with a Wood Elf backgroun because they just do not fit.

Kaihlik

Without Signature

Reply #28 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 15:44:29

I'm sure halflings still exist in the game. Just not supported until later, or maybe a nod in the background/bestiary

 

If halflings were so poplular, cool, and played by so many people they wouldn't have been cut from the first release.  Since they are honestly not so popular, as say Elves, Orcs etc.

 

And cutting Dark Elves and Orcs because haflings are out, like the one poster suggested is silly, like halflings are anyway near as cool as orcs and dark elves, or popular :)

Without signature

Reply #29 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 15:54:43
19
31

All I can say is halflings are generally my first choice of PC race when I'm playing (or they're at least in for serious consideration). When I'm GMing, there's generally a halfling in the group. I'd say they're more popular among my group than elves, or at least on the same level.

And what do you mean "cut from the first release"?

Reply #30 | Published on 13 August 2009 - 16:06:27

I find it completely ridiculous to cut the halflings from character choices. The halflings bring a different aspect of roleplaying within the game itself, always acting a bit more cheery in an extremely grim setting. They also represented a faction that had a good amount of knowledge on the undead, due to the proximity of the Moot and Sylvania.  It was a poor choice to remove that option from the game.

As for wood elves, I can't understand it. They are extremely secular, usually avoiding any contact with other civilizations unless facing an emergeny. And even then, it would take a hell of a push to get them out of the woods. I think this in itself shows that the 3rd edition is heading more towards a table top fighting game than a traditional rpg.

Page 2 of 3 (41 messages) « First page... 1 2 3 ...Last page »

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS