| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
| Page 2 of 10 (139 messages) | « First page... 1 2 3 4 5 ...Last page » |
StoneColdSpider said:
its good to see that this game seems to have a long future at FFG
i must admit i was a little worried that after the 4 Battle Packs that the game would fade slightly....
on a related note... does any1 know how long FFG are contractruly obligated to keep making/releasing new cards for W:I???
I don't think anyone knows, as long as it turns a profit I'm guessing as they just have the license from GW not a contractual obligation to make X sets of the card game as far as I'm aware. To be honest though, CoC was a dead CCG before being converted to an LCG, so it looks like the playerbase to sustain a living card game doesn't have to be massive (no offense to CoC players, I've just never really seen much about it elsewhere on the internet, and I haven't really seen many people playing it).
Without Signature
i hope when the High Elves and Dark Elves are done.... they start doing Vampire Counts or Tomb Kings i would love a good undead deck with zombies and skeletons 
Im a sarcastic perverted tourist robbing Australian convict
I seem to always be the one saying this, and believe me it isn't because I don't want people to have their favorite armies available to them, but I wouldn't count on anymore playable races with their own capitol boards. Despite it being a Games Workshop WHF IP it is not a table top game it is an LCG, a flavor of a CCG. If they try and support more than six factions there will be a serious watering down of the factions in the Battle Packs. Call of Cthulu has 7 and the development and eveness of those factions suffers a bit (not enough to ruin the game, but it is noticable.
I expect that each of the WHFB armies will eventually be represented in some amount but most likely as aligned neutrals.
"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."
thats ok dormouse :)
i wouldnt mind it if they were neutral cards like the skaven ones are....
Im a sarcastic perverted tourist robbing Australian convict
Neutrals are powerful. I can see future decks being pure neutral!
Take for instance the Witch Hunter hero from Skavenblight BP. 4 cost, 2 power, 4 health, and a sniping ability. That's GREAT.
No Signature Worth Showing
EDIT: Added the full spoiler for Path of the Zealot courtesy of Fiendish Devil, please check out his thread: www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_foros_discusion.asp
Without Signature
There is some new info on the 3rd BP in this thread that you could add.
www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_foros_discusion.asp
Nova Scotia LCG Hub: www.facebook.com/groups/285189418253161/
For card search, deckbuilder, articles,podcasts visit: http://www.cardgamedb.com/index.php/index.html
There is some data on the 4th Battle Pack is in here :
http://www.gametrademagazine.com/downloads/GTM119Games.pdf
Card names : Deatmaster Sniktch, Great Unclean One, War Hydra
Without Signature
Well that is pretty cool, a second Greater Daemon. And one that fits well in the Corruption cycle at that.
Nova Scotia LCG Hub: www.facebook.com/groups/285189418253161/
For card search, deckbuilder, articles,podcasts visit: http://www.cardgamedb.com/index.php/index.html
| Page 2 of 10 (139 messages) | « First page... 1 2 3 4 5 ...Last page » |