So I just watched a video with Paolo Parente filmed yesterday at the tourney in Arizona and he disclosed some pretty major news. He said a 2nd edition of Dust Tactics will be released by the end of this year and there will NOT be a 4th army out this year. Instead they will focus on building up the three existing factions until the release of 2nd edition. I'm guessing this means a new boxed set to replace the reived core set. He also said it's not going to have major rules changes, just fixing minor issues with the existing rules etc… Maybe they will fix some point costs for some units like Laura only costing 21 points…

I'm all for an overhaul of the rules, as long as they don't change anything for change's sake. Mainly I hope they can revitalize some units that tend to stay in the box (Hot Dog, Blackhawk, Hermann…). I think it's fairly likely that this 2nd edition will require a whole new Card Pack. It will also be good to have all the rules and skills in a single rulebook.

moffmalthus said:

Or Yakov being 30!  I hope they lower the cost of the helicopters to set them more in line with the Axis flyers.  I think every helicopter needs to be about 10 points cheaper.  I dont mind them being about 10 points more than the Axis counterparts, but 20-25 points more is just atrocious, and the transports at 40 points is far too high in my opinion as well, I think about 30 points is right.

Loophole Master said:

I would hate to see an "overhaul", but there are definitely some minor changes/fixes they can make.  I really do hope they release a new card pack with some point realignments.  I doubt this will make every unit worthwhile from a competitive standpoint, but some tweaking will at least help.

Yeah it would be great to see some of the units like the Hotdog made Viable somehow… I agree that transport choppers are rather high… maybe drop them to 32 or 33, make Yarkov about 45. He is just wrong on every level. I hear some people complaine about Winter child but I find him rather easy to take out with a good kill squad.

Winter Child is tough, but I feel he's priced accordingly.  Yakov is good, but I think 30 is about right, possibly a little too high.  His ability is great, but 30 points for an armor 2 hero seems about right.

I really hope they do something a bit more interesting with the pilots.

moffmalthus said:

The thing that I've learned about Winter Child is you can't assume he's a one-man wrecking crew.  The first few games I used him I thought he would be able to absorb much more damage than he did, and like everything in Dust, he will go down quickly if not supported properly.  I find it best to slow-play Winter Child and use him more as a decoy on a flank, then striking with him at the right time.  It forces your opponent to not commit his forces and leave certain units available to counter him, while the rest of your army can chip away at other stuff.

Loophole Master said:

Yeah, the big problem right now with pilots is the point cost.  I just dont find the value in using a pilot, espcially for the 20-25 points it costs.  I mean, is a one-time fighting spirit or take aim really good enough to pay that many points?  I don't think so.  It's sad too, because I really want to use Nikolai on some of the new SSU armor, but I just cant justify the points cost.

I 100% agree about Nikolai. There is no way he is worth 26 points for what you get. Total point sink there. I think Yarkov is cheap because with superior tactician you are almost guaranteed to win initiative every round. It works out much better than black ops on Bazooka Joe. I've mentioned this before too but they really need to change the activation so that if one oponent has more units than another they don't have say 4 or 5 units left to move at the end of a round. I've seen otherwise well balanced games fall apart because your oponent saves all there best units for last and stacks in several spotter teams or other cheap units just to get an unfair advantage.

moffmalthus said:

Right, and this is the reason why certain lists are much better in tournament play.  I mean, Recon Grenadiers for 16 points are just insanely powerful because you can spam a bunch of them for cheap, effectively being able to "out activate" your opponent.  

I've had this problem with my SSU, one of the main reasons I decided to start an SSU army was the helicopters and being able to do an "air mobile" army.  But between the high point cost of the transports and trying to fill them with infantry/walkers, I'm only able to squeeze in 7 or 8 units.  When fighting an army that has those cheap chuff models, they're able to hold back all their anti-air and wait for me to deploy/advance, then just blast away with it all, rendering that army useless.  Which is sad, because I prefer to use a smaller, more elite army rather than a "horde", but the advantages are largely in favor of unit count right now.

Do you have a link for that video?

Algernon said:

http://thegaminggang.com/2013/02/the-gaming-gang-interview-with-paolo-parente/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheGamingGang+(The+Gaming+Gang)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVLSlUPXzvE

While I do agree with many of the statements made here, I'd prefer not to see too many units get new stats or points, I for one don't want to have to buy a new Card Set every few years because they decided to re-point a bunch of units again.

But that said I would like to see some rules for army compisition, so that Recon and Observer spam lists designed solely to max out activations are not allowed.

But I guess well all have to wait and see, I hope we'll get a look at the rules well before the launch of the 2nd edition in the 4th Quarter.

Miah999 said:

You and me both.  They are missing a huge opportunity for making the game better if they don't ask for our input before finalizing the new rules.

As for buying new cards, I don't mind as long as they're reasonably priced.  The last upgrade pack was only about $12--I had no problem spending that. 

But we have way more units now, so the next upgrade pack will probably be more like $25, I'm thinking.  Which would still be fair, IMHO.