Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...
You are here: FFG Forums /  Board and Card Games /  Tannhauser

Tannhauser
The Army of the Union vs. the Reich's Obscura Korps in the Great War, circa 1949!
Moderator: ffgjafferGeckoInquisitor AresThe Spaniard Topics: 938 | Posts: 6361
FFG, Please Don't Abandon the Tannhauser Universe!
Published on 12 July 2012 - 21:05:50
Page 2 of 2 (26 messages) « First page... 1 2
Reply #16 | Published on 17 July 2012 - 07:19:19

Rontules said:

There is one thing i'm very sad of and is that the new faction doesn't get any possible variations, Shogunate has a full squad but nothing more, that's bad, if they went dropping the franchise with two shogunate character instead of Edison and Frankenstahl i would have been more pleased.

I absolutely agree with your thoughts on the Shogunate. Before we knew about the end of TH, I always hoped for the release of a new Shogunate character to further develop that faction. Not only do they have nothing more than a full squad without any possible variation, but they are lacking a powerful ranged fighter to support their melee characters. Way too often, the Shogunate characters enter melee only to be gunned down by enemies from a distance, sometimes even from out-of-path.

But as much as I liked to see new Shogunate characters, I can understand FFG's decision to release a Union and a Reich character. These will be useful for more players and thus be bought by more players, simply because everyone who owns the core set can play Union or Reich and will probably buy powerful characters for these faction, where Shogunate characters will only be bought by those who have already invested in the Shogunate. Additionally, there weren't any Union or Reich releases lately, so the fans of these factions maybe are getting angry.

Last point: Whatever character or faction anyone of us would have liked to be released, FFG releases two characters that seem to be cool and that every TH player will be able to use. So if everyone actually buys these characters and thus some profit is generated, maybe FFG will reconsider their decision to end TH.

Dear FFG, please don't stop the Tannhäuser line completely! Maybe just step down the release of new product to two (maybe one) characters per year just to keep players interested. Maybe release mercenary characters that would be useful for every faction thus every player. Maybe release a pack containing all the existing bonus tokens but no miniature. Anything, please!

Reply #17 | Published on 17 July 2012 - 07:53:34

??! if that was the case why not releasing more mercs? or a dual Reich/Shogunate character as Oksana (or my home rule for Hoss)…

By the way your nik is… difficult to pronounce 

Without signature

Reply #18 | Published on 17 July 2012 - 08:23:52

I don't know about FFG's actual reason to announce Edison and Frankenstahl instead of other characters, I just posted what I supposed to be the reason. But you are right of course, dual faction characters would be a good idea to generate more sales. Same goes for mercenary characters, which I included in my new signature although I generally rather dislike lots of mercenary characters because they take away the unique flavor and playstyle of the different factions. This could be a reason for FFG to announce two new affiliated characters instead of mercenaries, but again I don't know. That said, of course I'd buy and play any mercenary character if the alternative is getting no characters at all. A powerful new mercenary hero or even a mercenary trooper pack would be useful for every player, so it could be a way to go for FFG …

Dear FFG, please don't stop the Tannhäuser line completely! Maybe just step down the release of new product to two (maybe one) characters per year just to keep players interested. Maybe release mercenary characters that would be useful for every faction thus every player. Maybe release a pack containing all the existing bonus tokens but no miniature. Anything, please!

Reply #19 | Published on 17 July 2012 - 10:05:01

A lot of the reason for the choice of a Reich and Union character, has to do with how much of those figures was already finished.

TOY had already done some of the development work for both Edison and Frank back in 2008, so they just took less work then new Shogunate or Mercs that exsists only as art or even less.

They just took less time and money.

I don't always play board-games, but when I do I play Tannhauser.

Keep gaming my friend.

 

Visit us at our blog:

http://www.front-toward-enemy.us

 

Reply #20 | Published on 18 July 2012 - 04:45:14

Miah999 said:

A lot of the reason for the choice of a Reich and Union character, has to do with how much of those figures was already finished.

TOY had already done some of the development work for both Edison and Frank back in 2008, so they just took less work then new Shogunate or Mercs that exsists only as art or even less.

They just took less time and money.

I didnt know that, now it mkes much more sense :-)

Without signature

Reply #21 | Published on 18 July 2012 - 08:06:41

Neither did I! They really had these finished or half-finished characters lying on their desks for years but didn't finish and release them yet? Why? And even more important: How many great, ready-to-be-released characters will they find if they actually start looking around in their drawers?

Dear FFG, please don't stop the Tannhäuser line completely! Maybe just step down the release of new product to two (maybe one) characters per year just to keep players interested. Maybe release mercenary characters that would be useful for every faction thus every player. Maybe release a pack containing all the existing bonus tokens but no miniature. Anything, please!

Reply #22 | Published on 18 July 2012 - 09:53:57

As I understand it and of course I may have been misslead: when FFG purchased TH in 2009 literal boxes of material for TH was sent from TOY and it took over a year just to sort and translate it. After that they tried not to releasse thing so fast as to overwhelm the market.

I imagine that many of the characters seen in Field Ops are complete art wise, but if TOY did any development work it would be TH 1.0 and of not much use Mechanics wise. Who can say how much work was done on the Shogunate before TH was sold.

I don't always play board-games, but when I do I play Tannhauser.

Keep gaming my friend.

 

Visit us at our blog:

http://www.front-toward-enemy.us

 

Reply #23 | Published on 16 January 2013 - 06:09:45
0
1

 

Dear FFG, please don't stop the Tannhäuser line completely! Maybe just step down the release of new product to two (maybe one) characters per year just to keep players interested. Maybe release mercenary characters that would be useful for every faction thus every player. Maybe release a pack containing all the existing bonus tokens but no miniature. Anything, please!

 

 

Without Signature
Reply #24 | Published on 16 January 2013 - 06:09:59
0
1

 

Dear FFG, please don't stop the Tannhäuser line completely! Maybe just step down the release of new product to two (maybe one) characters per year just to keep players interested. Maybe release mercenary characters that would be useful for every faction thus every player. Maybe release a pack containing all the existing bonus tokens but no miniature. Anything, please!

 

 

Without Signature
Reply #25 | Published on 17 January 2013 - 21:05:39
5
0

I sign this. Tannhauser is fantastic. A big box expansion would surely help the sales. And why does BGG don't even have a revised edtion listing of it? This game drags the bad reputation from the 1st edition. Let the world know how good it is now!

Without Signature
Reply #26 | Published on 17 January 2013 - 21:05:49
5
0
Happy Birthday!

I sign this. Tannhauser is fantastic. A big box expansion would surely help the sales. And why does BGG don't even have a revised edtion listing of it? This game drags the bad reputation from the 1st edition. Let the world know how good it is now!

Without Signature
Page 2 of 2 (26 messages) « First page... 1 2
You are here: FFG Forums /  Board and Card Games /  Tannhauser

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS