Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

Call of Cthulhu Deck Construction
Call of Cthulhu Deck Construction
Moderator: FFG NateFFGAntonFFGHataffgjafferffgjoshFFGStuartFFG_IanGeckoGood_TravelerThe Spaniard Topics: 321 | Posts: 2549
Mi-Go Decks not viable ?
by Rosh87
Published on 13 October 2010 - 15:13:17
Page 3 of 4 (47 messages) « First page... 2 3 4 ...Last page »
Reply #31 | Published on 08 July 2012 - 00:36:00
32
13

Mi-Go decks did do quite well at the FFG Regionals this year. The two that showed up ended up in the top 4 IIRC.

Reply #32 | Published on 08 July 2012 - 19:42:07

Hellfury said:

Mi-Go decks did do quite well at the FFG Regionals this year. The two that showed up ended up in the top 4 IIRC.

Do you recall how they were playing them and if they were mono Shub?

Without Signature
Reply #33 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 02:18:05

Hellfury said:

Mi-Go decks did do quite well at the FFG Regionals this year. The two that showed up ended up in the top 4 IIRC.

There was also one at the German Regionals. It used Yog as a secondary faction and the Descendant of Eibon as its restricted card. It also featured a bunch of characters from other factions to put into play (like Dreamlands Fanatic and Master Of Myth).

Without signature

Reply #34 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 15:06:48

jhaelen said:

Hellfury said:

 

Mi-Go decks did do quite well at the FFG Regionals this year. The two that showed up ended up in the top 4 IIRC.

 

There was also one at the German Regionals. It used Yog as a secondary faction and the Descendant of Eibon as its restricted card. It also featured a bunch of characters from other factions to put into play (like Dreamlands Fanatic and Master Of Myth).

 

I've considered Yog, but with Doppleganger for my restricted card (can turn it into a copy of your Mi-Go character that will give the greatest benefit at the moment).

Without Signature
Reply #35 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 16:11:45

Are there copies of any of these decks online?  I'd like to see/try some of them.

Without Signature

Reply #36 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 17:52:18
32
13

dboeren said:

Are there copies of any of these decks online?  I'd like to see/try some of them.

Not that I am aware of, sadly. I urged them all to post their decks online, but havent seen them.

Not to devalue the ideas of their Mi-Go decks, but their decks were fairly rudimentary as far as what one would expect to be contained within a Mi-Go tribal deck. Nothing really esoteric about the builds.

Lots of Mi-Go characters that add to the greater Mi-Go mutual benefit pool, a few support cards that do the same, etc. A couple choices that add flavor to what you think you may need (like burrowing beneath, etc.)

It just shows how a decent deck when played well can really shine.

With that said, they did not fare well against destruction. They were not fast enough to really dominate as quickly as Mi-Go are known for when they explode across the board when not facing destruction.

Reply #37 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 18:05:20

Hellfury said:

 

dboeren said:

Are there copies of any of these decks online?  I'd like to see/try some of them.

 

Not that I am aware of, sadly. I urged them all to post their decks online, but havent seen them.

Not to devalue the ideas of their Mi-Go decks, but their decks were fairly rudimentary as far as what one would expect to be contained within a Mi-Go tribal deck. Nothing really esoteric about the builds.

Lots of Mi-Go characters that add to the greater Mi-Go mutual benefit pool, a few support cards that do the same, etc. A couple choices that add flavor to what you think you may need (like burrowing beneath, etc.)

It just shows how a decent deck when played well can really shine.

With that said, they did not fare well against destruction. They were not fast enough to really dominate as quickly as Mi-Go are known for when they explode across the board when not facing destruction.

 

 

I've found this to be a huge weakness as well which is why I think the new Abhorrent Spore card from Lost Rites is going to be a big help to any Mi-Go deck.  There are some great options for dealing with Khopesh as well.  I think the only other major weakness they have is Terror.  You need a Mi-Go skull in order to get them a Terror icon and you can only have one in a play at a time.

Without Signature
Reply #38 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 18:15:11
32
13

Well, all you really need is one…

Reply #39 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 18:44:52

Hellfury said:

Well, all you really need is one…

Depends on if you just want protection form insanity or if you want to win Terror struggles.

Without Signature
Reply #40 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 19:00:30
32
13

ssjevot said:

Hellfury said:

 

Well, all you really need is one…

 

 

Depends on if you just want protection form insanity or if you want to win Terror struggles.

That sounds like looking the gift horse in the mouth to me.

If you want to win a terror struggle then commit lots of mi-go to stories. But you are at least protected from insanity so that really should be enough frankly.

They already get any other icon and a compounded amount of those to boot, even beating nerds in investigation easily.

So again, it sounds like looking the gift horse in the mouth to me. If winning terror struggles are that important, then you are playing the wrong deck. Mi-Go cannot and should not be the end all of deck builds. it has to have a drawback. Them even getting access to Terror is pretty strong already in my opinion.

Reply #41 | Published on 09 July 2012 - 21:55:10

Hellfury said:

With that said, they did not fare well against destruction. They were not fast enough to really dominate as quickly as Mi-Go are known for when they explode across the board when not facing destruction.

That's what I was thinking too.  Mi-Go excel when you can pile up a lot of them and get those bonuses up.  With the meta featuring a lot of character removal lately (although it may be swinging back the other way now?) that's not a good environment for them.

Without Signature

Reply #42 | Published on 10 July 2012 - 02:46:46

ssjevot said:

I've considered Yog, but with Doppleganger for my restricted card (can turn it into a copy of your Mi-Go character that will give the greatest benefit at the moment).
Actually he (or was it his his friend?) used the Doppelganger when we were playtesting our decks a couple of weeks before the tournament.

At one point one of them also used a Mi-Go deck with Cthulhu as a secondary faction featuring the Khopesh. I guess, there are many variations on a Mi-Go deck that can work quite well.

 

Without signature

Reply #43 | Published on 23 July 2012 - 15:16:39
32
13

Mark participated in the FFG EC casual tourney this saturday, and he remembered that I had requested a deck list for his mi-go. So he provided the following list:

 

x3 Snowgraves

x2 Y'golonac

x2 Mi-go scout

x2 Mi-go warrior

x3 Gibbering soul

x3 Eat the dead

x2 Mi-go dreams

x3 Mi-go surgeon

x3 Mi-go commander

x3 Ageless Mi-go

x3 Diseased sewer rats

x3 Mi-go caretaker

x3 Mi-go guard

x3 Mi-go observer

x2 Mi-go skull

x3 Wooden Homonculus

x2 Bred to survive

x2 Burrowing Beneath

x2 Horrid Mutation

x3 Open grave

Total: 52 cards

Reply #44 | Published on 03 August 2012 - 16:42:31

 What kinds of decks did you face off against? See anything interesting or note worthy, or just unexpected?

"Crumbs, DM!"

Reply #45 | Published on 05 August 2012 - 13:21:08
32
13

I played yog/cthulhu destruction at that tourney. The only deck that really gave me fits was Matt's Syndicate/hastur deck (which I faced twice) and was designed to go against destruction and his deck did a great job of it as I was never able to get a foothold against it. Hastur always seemed to be in his hand to answer any threat I gave. Matt didn't even have all the cards he would have liked to build the deck and just built with what small pool he had available. He played it VERY well and deserved the top honors that day in my book.

I faced both Mi-go decks. I certainly did not expect to see those. Destruction made short work of them, unfortunately. Especially once Cthulhu II was in play as he locked down the board once board control was established.

Oddly enough, one of the mi-go players liked facing my destruction deck more than my mill deck. He said discard was extremely unfun to play against whenever we played in the past. I can see that, but personally I find it odd as mono Yog takes considerably more finesse to pull off a win with and is an uncommon deck type seen in competitive venues.

The meta was pretty mixed. A lot of new players. Josh has done a great job in organizing local players to actually attend game nights at FFG.

 

Page 3 of 4 (47 messages) « First page... 2 3 4 ...Last page »

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS