Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...
You are here: FFG Forums /  Roleplaying Games /  Only War

Only War
They are the thin line that protects mankind. They are the Imperial Guard.
Moderator: FFG Andy FischerFFGMark Topics: 372 | Posts: 4310
Female Soldiers in the IG and Pregnancy
Published on 21 July 2012 - 11:16:45

About two weeks ago my players brought up a few interesting questions that I'd like to ask the forum.
It's well known that the Imperial Guard employs men and women both in single gender and mixed gender units both on the front lines and probably on various support tasks. At least in my interpretation of the setting the Soldier of the IG are not constantly fighting, there's downtime, there's patrol duty and even some R&R every now and then. I'm imagining that a lot of soldier seek various enjoyments in their time away from the front be it alcohol, gambling, illegal drugs or sex.
So we were wondering what would happen if a female soldier got pregnant during her tour of duty? Would they get moved to a different unit that operates away from the front? What about the baby itself once she gives birth (assuming she surives that time and doesn't suffer from any complications due to stress or the combat itself)? Is it "property" of the Imperial Guard? Would she get maternity leave? (I'm guessing she wouldn't considering the setting).

What if it were not a common Soldier but an Officer or other non-grunt?

Page 1 of 4 (47 messages) 1 2 3 4 ...Last page »
Reply #1 | Published on 21 July 2012 - 11:11:14

 I think this would be illigal but will still frequently happen. I think  she will removed from duty until her gives birth. The childe will probably be given to the Schola Progenium after which the mother will be returned to the front. Serving in a penal legion or something.

"A dirty mind is a joy forevera terrible thing to waste"

"Innocence Proves Nothing"


Reply #2 | Published on 21 July 2012 - 20:33:05

I think Santiago is right. One thing I'd point out, though, is that the brutal regementation of the IG probably means that female troopers in mixed units are required by regulation to be on contraception- probably in the form of some kind of long-term 'Norplant'-like device/injection.

And, if it needs to be said: it's always a bad idea to let your PCs breed!

Reply #3 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 03:30:59

Adeptus-B said:

And, if it needs to be said: it's always a bad idea to let your PCs breed!



Well, I disagree on that one. I had a great blast with creating a lineage for my Rogue Trader game and messing with their own family. But in a game like Only War I would say it should be bad.

"A dirty mind is a joy forevera terrible thing to waste"

"Innocence Proves Nothing"


Reply #4 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 08:55:37

Santiago said:

 I think this would be illigal but will still frequently happen. I think  she will removed from duty until her gives birth. The childe will probably be given to the Schola Progenium after which the mother will be returned to the front. Serving in a penal legion or something.

The novel Imperial Glory (focussing on a regiment of Brimlock Dragoons, some 20 years after their founding) mentions that a lot of the regiment's support "staff" are family members of the rank and file, which includes children. When these children come of age, they become Guardsmen themselves.

This idea doesn't sound too unreasonable, particularly for regiments within a Crusade, where a regiment's demobilisation (if it survives that long) will see them colonise a reconquered world - by allowing soldiers to bring along their families (or form new ones) during their service, there's a ready-made colonial population.

Nathan 'N0-1_H3r3' Dowdell

Writing Credits so far: Into the Storm, Edge of the Abyss, Battlefleet KoronusBlack Crusade Core Rulebook, Hostile Acquisitions, First Founding, The Jericho Reach, The Soul Reaver, Only War Core Rulebook, The Navis Primer & Ark of Lost Souls

Disclaimer: Any & all comments I make on these forums are my own opinion, not those of Fantasy Flight Games. My comments & rules suggestions should not be taken as official, are for all intents & purposes nothing more than the words of a devoted fan & long-time member of this community.

A collection of my unofficial supplements can be found here.

Reply #5 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 13:36:51

N0-1_H3r3 said:

 

 

The novel Imperial Glory (focussing on a regiment of Brimlock Dragoons, some 20 years after their founding) mentions that a lot of the regiment's support "staff" are family members of the rank and file, which includes children. When these children come of age, they become Guardsmen themselves.

This idea doesn't sound too unreasonable, particularly for regiments within a Crusade, where a regiment's demobilisation (if it survives that long) will see them colonise a reconquered world - by allowing soldiers to bring along their families (or form new ones) during their service, there's a ready-made colonial population.

 

 

Never read that book, but being an Army man myself and knowing some Warhammer 40k fluff, I'm assuming the children are from the female civilian population that regiments drag along with them.  The IG needs it's fighting power, and considering how cruel the IG can be, I would not rule out them snipping / tying the womens tubes.  Or giving them the novaplax sponge, pills, or injections, or anything else Warhammer 40k fluff related so the the women soldiers in the IG unit do NOT get pregnant.

Maybe if they filled paperwork requesting pregnancy during their down time, or after the unit demobilizes can that be lifted.  If a female soldier did get pregnant during war tours, she would/should be punished like what Santiago stated.

If the unit is more civilized and allows the females to get pregnant during war tours (highly unrecommended, but that's just my opinion), then what you stated applies.  In essence, no matter what, it's the GM's call with advice coming from the players upon unit creation / background fluff.

"Live long, so that others may prosper in your endeavours….  or so that you can piss on your enemies graves."

Additional DH & RT material can be found on the link provided below.  Most of the material was provided by others players, while some of it was created/edited by me.  GM discretion is advised. 

docs.google.com/

Reply #6 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 15:11:25

 It very well might depend on the CO of the unit is question. I could see some officers(or commissars) ruthlessly punishing though render themselves in any way unfit for front line duty. I could see others giving what amounts to a slap on the wrist in the case of pregnancy and likely transfering the woman in question to non-front line duties.

 

It depends how you want to potray the Guard. Are guardsmen at even greater risk from their own superiors then the enemies they were sent to fight? Are their CO's aloof and uncaring? Or do they actually care for the lives on their men? Giving the order for a costly with great regret? Wishing there was a less costly alternative?

Without Signature
Reply #7 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 20:16:25

 though there has not yet been a pregnant trooper in the ghosts yet the gaunts ghosts books do sometimes touch on the other side of the guard, the camp followers, who are often as numerous as the troopers themselves, everything from cooks, to prostitutes, to troopers wives, maids, and basiclly anything else a person could think might follow an army around. 

also remember warp travel takes along time add to that lost orders, the time it takes to set up or take down camp, its possible more than a year or two can pass between actual deployments.

remember something like 80% of cadians are in the army but they still find time to make more cadians. 

Without Signature

Reply #8 | Published on 22 July 2012 - 23:20:14

Who is gonna play the regimental groundsheet?

 

Ahhhh yeah.

Without Signature

Reply #9 | Published on 23 July 2012 - 04:43:35

Nameless2all said:

 

Never read that book, but being an Army man myself and knowing some Warhammer 40k fluff, I'm assuming the children are from the female civilian population that regiments drag along with them.  The IG needs it's fighting power, and considering how cruel the IG can be, I would not rule out them snipping / tying the womens tubes.  Or giving them the novaplax sponge, pills, or injections, or anything else Warhammer 40k fluff related so the the women soldiers in the IG unit do NOT get pregnant.

In the case depicted in the novel, the regiment's fighting strength was exclusively male, so pregnancy didn't impact upon the front lines and none of those measures would have been required.

Nathan 'N0-1_H3r3' Dowdell

Writing Credits so far: Into the Storm, Edge of the Abyss, Battlefleet KoronusBlack Crusade Core Rulebook, Hostile Acquisitions, First Founding, The Jericho Reach, The Soul Reaver, Only War Core Rulebook, The Navis Primer & Ark of Lost Souls

Disclaimer: Any & all comments I make on these forums are my own opinion, not those of Fantasy Flight Games. My comments & rules suggestions should not be taken as official, are for all intents & purposes nothing more than the words of a devoted fan & long-time member of this community.

A collection of my unofficial supplements can be found here.

Reply #10 | Published on 24 July 2012 - 02:43:53
2
0

It is also briefly mentioned in the novel The Traitor's Hand that, due to the fact that it was a mixed regiment and because it was a part of his duties as commissar of the Valhallan 597th, Ciaphas Cain occasionally had to deal with female guardsmen who ended up becoming pregnant.

Without Signature

Reply #11 | Published on 24 July 2012 - 12:51:09

On one hand, I think it would be illegal and my gut immediately told me "forced termination of pregnancy". But if I think about it, I sincerely doubt that would happen, given that the Imperial Creed likely forbids abortions, on account of them being human and the Imperium and the Emperor always wanting more, at the very least, soldiers for the constant war efforts and the unending crusades against the enemies of the Imperium.

But it would at the same time likely be illegal for women to become pregnant, because every soldier is valuable in their own right, here, now, in the present - not a potential soldier 15-20 years down the line.

Because if it's not illegal, I could see female soldiers using pregnancy as an excuse or tactic to avoid the front. But this could also explain why the vast majority of Imperial Guardsmen are.. well.. guardsMEN - despite the supposed equality within the Imperial Guard/Navy.

[QUOTE efidm=684956]Never read that book, but being an Army man myself and knowing some Warhammer 40k fluff, I'm assuming the children are from the female civilian population that regiments drag along with them. The IG needs it's fighting power, and considering how cruel the IG can be, I would not rule out them snipping / tying the womens tubes. Or giving them the novaplax sponge, pills, or injections, or anything else Warhammer 40k fluff related so the the women soldiers in the IG unit do NOT get pregnant.

[…][/QUOTE]Almost anything is possible and I'd say that it is even likely that males or females could get all manner of hormonal injections or contraceptives, but as for tying  the tubes - permanent solutions like that - I'd say that's a big no-no. They'd definitely want females to be able to be fertile again, should they survive their tour of duty.

"It's never too late to panic."
~ Popular Valhallan folk saying

Since so many seem to have trouble understanding Technology, Machine SpiritsMechanicus: Link.

Reply #12 | Published on 24 July 2012 - 21:20:59

Fgdsfg said:

 

Almost anything is possible and I'd say that it is even likely that males or females could get all manner of hormonal injections or contraceptives, but as for tying  the tubes - permanent solutions like that - I'd say that's a big no-no. They'd definitely want females to be able to be fertile again, should they survive their tour of duty.

 

 

It's reversible silly, because my wife has it and I've looked into getting it fixed.  But…. I see your point.  The IG wouldn't care that any surgery is a risk no matter how minor, because (IMO) it is would be more efficient and they wouldn't have to worry about periodic injections/pills getting misplaced, damaged, lost, or tainted.  With injections, sponges, pills, etc that cause infertility and such, I'm sure in the future there might be other injections, pills, etc. that reverse the effects, that guardsmen could get ahold of on the blackmarket.  Maybe the snipping or tying the tubes could be a final punishment on a female soldier that keeps getting pregnant, before they finally shoot her for disobeying lawful orders.  But hey, the specifics don't have to be mentioned on what the IG does to make an IG woman not get pregnant, other than the GM saying yay or nay that you can or can't get pregnant.

You go ahead and send a pregnant woman to fight a war with these symptoms.  www.americanpregnancy.org/gettingpregnant/earlypregnancysymptoms.html/  I don't think anyone would survive, besides that woman and her baby.  Now are you guys/gals wanting to play SIMS or a War Game here?  I'd keep the pregnancy thing as an off camera / downtime event.

"Live long, so that others may prosper in your endeavours….  or so that you can piss on your enemies graves."

Additional DH & RT material can be found on the link provided below.  Most of the material was provided by others players, while some of it was created/edited by me.  GM discretion is advised. 

docs.google.com/

Reply #13 | Published on 24 July 2012 - 21:31:04

blackwell said:

It is also briefly mentioned in the novel The Traitor's Hand that, due to the fact that it was a mixed regiment and because it was a part of his duties as commissar of the Valhallan 597th, Ciaphas Cain occasionally had to deal with female guardsmen who ended up becoming pregnant.

To help this dilemma move along, what did Cain specifically do, and was it a punishment or just a transfer thing?

"Live long, so that others may prosper in your endeavours….  or so that you can piss on your enemies graves."

Additional DH & RT material can be found on the link provided below.  Most of the material was provided by others players, while some of it was created/edited by me.  GM discretion is advised. 

docs.google.com/

Reply #14 | Published on 25 July 2012 - 05:24:02
2
0

Nameless2all said:

blackwell said:

 

It is also briefly mentioned in the novel The Traitor's Hand that, due to the fact that it was a mixed regiment and because it was a part of his duties as commissar of the Valhallan 597th, Ciaphas Cain occasionally had to deal with female guardsmen who ended up becoming pregnant.

 

 

To help this dilemma move along, what did Cain specifically do, and was it a punishment or just a transfer thing?

 

The section in question was one of Amberley Vail's footnotes and it reads as follows:

Cain's apparent familiarity with the habits of infants is not explained anywhere else in the archive. However he was serving with a mixed regiment at the time, so its quite likely that the inevitable occurred on more than one occasion. If so, as the regimental commissar, he would have been responsible for ensuring the welfare of all concerned.

From p. 518 of Ciaphas Cain: Hero of the Imperium, feel free to interpret it any way you want.

Without Signature

Reply #15 | Published on 25 July 2012 - 05:35:11

Fgdsfg said:

 

On one hand, I think it would be illegal and my gut immediately told me "forced termination of pregnancy". But if I think about it, I sincerely doubt that would happen, given that the Imperial Creed likely forbids abortions, on account of them being human and the Imperium and the Emperor always wanting more, at the very least, soldiers for the constant war efforts and the unending crusades against the enemies of the Imperium.

I'm always dubious of suggestions that the Imperial Creed is anti abortion. I've seen variations on the "we just want more humans" argument advanced as reasons for why the Imperium would be anti-homosexual, too. I don't rate either argument.

Yes, the Ministorum is a pastiche of the Catholic Church, but although it attempts to play on many of the same tropes, it's not a carbon copy. It certainly doesn't replicate its beliefs exactly. I don't necessarily believe that the Imperium is ant-abortion. BITS of it certainly will be, and bits of it won't. It's a huge universe, after all.

Equally, I'd be incredibly surprised if the Imperial Guard forced terminations on their soldiers.

I like the Abnett-style Guard - harsh and bureaucratic, but not actively malign or fanatically issue-driven. They're (largely) professional soldiers, not religious or political fanatics along the lines of the Khmer Rouge. There's a kind of world-weariness about the Abnett Guard. Yes, they send millions to their deaths in horrific warzones, but equally they have camp followers, romantic relationships and the like. Commissars are portrayed as both whip-wielding fanatics and very human mentor figures within each regiment.

I would imagine that most Commissars, if facing a pregnant Guardswoman, would act like modern military officers in the same situation. They might be dicks about it and rant and rave at her about how she's scuppering her career or the mission etc, or they might be supportive and helpful. But I don't think they would routinely require terminations, execution or disciplinary action, as is suggested on this thread. More likely you'd look at transfer to administrative or other non-physical duties.
 

The mind is its own place, and in itself, can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.

www.smallstepsforsophie.org.uk

Page 1 of 4 (47 messages) 1 2 3 4 ...Last page »
You are here: FFG Forums /  Roleplaying Games /  Only War

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS