ScottieATF said:

Yes. The DS tiebreaker is total objectives destroyed in the match. So you need to record the number you destroyed as LS as well as DS. 

I put this together with InDesign. 

Updated first post with v2 scorecard.

Very nice! I really hope FFG will incorporatet this. Have they responded to you sending it to them yet?

So I have an idea to make this a little better: incorporate the decklist along with this. Since the decklist is basically 10 sets of 6 card OSets, it might be able to fit on a half sheet. In this way, the document could be all inclusive. When paring, simply fold the document in half to cover the list.

Holliday88 said:

No I get why you have to record objectives scored, just why you seperated them rather then just having the objectives that player destroyed in the game.  I don't iike having the two numbers for different players on the same line .  I feel like people will add those together rather then thier LS and thier DS objective scores

ScottieATF said:

Oh, I see what you mean. Good point, let met think on it. I wanted to have all the tiebreakers on one sheet so the TO didn't have to compare sheets in case of discrepancy. But, I do like the consistency of  always recording only your own results.

MasterJediAdam said:

Do you mean something different from v2? I added a deck list to the side of the card.

Didn't see there was a version 2. Looks like you read my mind … 

Holliday88 said:

maybe rename them to specify better objectives you destroyed vs your opponents, that way you still have all the info on one card, but they will be clearer as to what to compare to what.  and at least they will be vertically next to each other as opposed to caddy corner like now.

also any though to renaming the "tie" slot as just "bonus" and making it just one box as opposed to two, since you'd never be marking more then one box of it if that.

Updated the cards to simplify the tiebreakers and added a player #. The links on the first post are updated to v2.1.

I would suggest what MasterJediAdam came with - as it is, your opponents can see your decklist if the card is not folded. And the Decklist area is rather small with only five lines - on the other hand, there is place for 8 matches, which will rarely come into being in a tournament.

My suggestions is to remove the 8th match and put the total strength of schedule little left, so it ends at the same place as the match table does. The Decklist can then be both expanded (if for example someone comes into tournament with only one core, they would need more room) and it can be both folded or cut of and given to the TO.

Other than that, totally awesome. My worries is just that people will have to write really tiny into the decklist area.

And thanks for the reply - I'll send the translation as soon as you are really happy with the finality of the scorecard.

Jedi_Knight said:

I did think about your opponent being able to 'spy' your deck list before the match. The easiest way to avoid this si to turn your card over until you need to record game results. WIth a blank back you're also being given a place to jot down notes in case you want to record the number of force icons in the opponents hand after you play 'Interrogation.'

As for the number of mathces, I agree with you that 8 is probably a lot. However, I do want this to be as versatile as possible. I will create a 6 match version and you guys can be free to use which ever card you need.

Awesome, just pure awesomness. Thanks.

Updated first post to include a 6-match version.

This is fantastic - thanks so much for sharing (and saving me from having to come up with one myself).

Only suggestion I have is to include a match total, which is then followed by the running tournament total column you've already got (but also adding a reference to indicate that it is a running total).

Love your work!