Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

The Lord of the Rings: The Card Game
Gather your heroes and face the coming darkness!
Moderator: ffgjoshFFGMarkGeckoThe Spaniard Topics: 2423 | Posts: 29539
HoN rules sheet is up
Published on 26 November 2012 - 06:57:35

 http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/ffg_content/lotr-lcg/support/rulesheets/Heirs-of-Numenor_rules.pdf

Without Signature

Page 1 of 1 (5 messages) 1
Reply #1 | Published on 27 November 2012 - 02:09:36

 Thanks.

The new rules on unique cards are interesting.

They make it even more certain we will see Faramir as a hero.

They are also evidence of the designers thinking carefully about a minor but niggling rules problem in advance - this is encouraging.

Without Signature

Reply #2 | Published on 27 November 2012 - 04:44:58

Didn´t we have these rule since the base game rulebook?!

"Wenn mehr von uns Heiterkeit, gutes Tafeln und klingende Lieder höher als gehortetes Gold schätzen würden, so hätten wir eine fröhlichere Welt."

----Links for NEW PLAYERS (and old ones)----

Reply #3 | Published on 27 November 2012 - 05:09:29
2
0

Yes but the phrasing is very specifically aimed at Heroes and Allies sharing the same title so it does indeed seem to point towards a Faramir Hero.

Without Signature

Reply #4 | Published on 27 November 2012 - 06:20:26

I don't know…We already have Beorn as a Hero and an Ally. To be honest I don't see the difference between the rulings. I have always played it where Unique means unique. So only 1 copy could be in play at any give time.

"For the night is dark and full of terrors"

 

Star Wars X-Wing Ships:

4 X-Wings
3 Y-Wings
1 A-Wing
1 YT-1300

6 Tie-Fighters
2 Tie-Advanced
1 Tie-Interceptor
2 Firespray

 

 

Reply #5 | Published on 27 November 2012 - 06:57:34

 

Sure - I agree that it is pretty obvious how this issue should work.

My point was: I am much happier to see FFG being very cautious in clarifying potential rules issues, even if it isn't really necessary. Compared to the cavalier disregard of very obvious rules problems they have previously shown (Foundations of Stone being the worst example in my view).

Without Signature

Page 1 of 1 (5 messages) 1

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS