| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
So I was talking to Bruno after he defeated Butzlaff in the joust final. I was, you know, probing him for info about what kind of card he thought he would design. I'd like to plan for all my future decks to include it. Anyway… My tenacity paid off because he recently sent me this concept.

Without Signature
| Page 1 of 2 (22 messages) | 1 2 ...Last page » |
I like it. But, it should be just Targ, or just Targ and Martell. There are too many houses on it right now.
GoTLove? said:
So I was talking to Bruno after he defeated Butzlaff in the joust final. I was, you know, probing him.
I like to be probed!
First Snow lives on better than ever!
Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.
If I recall it was something like:
Dirty Maester
Kneel all lady cards in play to end this phase.
This was after Damon told him flat out that he could not make a Hayden card.
But… that card was too powerful, so I think its going to be
Soft Bottom
Location
Soft Bottom is always knelt.
Not sure about the point behind the card, but I assume there is a reason.
| 1 | 2 |
Keggy said:
Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.
I vote for Podrick Payne!
I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.
Probably because I'm immature.
MeatLoafX said:
I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.
Probably because I'm immature.
I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.
[11/14/2012 10:07:06 PM] [REDACTED]: the game is just so much more fun these days with dennis involved
dcdennis said:
MeatLoafX said:
I still think a Bran Stark card that reads "Bran Stark cannot stand" would be hilarious.
Probably because I'm immature.
I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.
That… would be… amazing.
Also, I'm still the only one who keeps hoping a Champion designs a Mad King card, huh? :( I just want my crazy Targaryen King already.
Without Signature
DubiousYak said:
Keggy said:
Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.
I vote for Podrick Payne!
You'd think that after 10 years he'd have at least 1 card.
Keggy said:
DubiousYak said:
Keggy said:
Tinygrimes told me Bruno wanted to make a Dickon Manwoody card. I'm still hoping he makes Podrick Payne.
I vote for Podrick Payne!
You'd think that after 10 years he'd have at least 1 card.
There has been one Podrick, way back in A Song of Twilight.
http://www.agotcards.org/card/v/2743
We need Podrick. Is he the most significant character not yet in the LCG card pool? Maybe some House Arryn people.
dcdennis said:
I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.
Too bad the only Hodor we have can't have attachments…
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. -Terry Pratchett
Skowza said:
dcdennis said:
I know someone had an idea that there should be a Bran Attachment - Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon. If attached character is Hodor, Hodor loses the ally trait and can now attack.
Too bad the only Hodor we have can't have attachments…
Change the text of the Bran attachment:
"Attached character gains +2 STR and an INT Icon.
If Hodor is in play, this attachment ignores/bypasses the "No attachments." text on Hodor. Remove the Ally trait from Hodor. Hodor can now attack."
Simple fix, really.
Without Signature
| Page 1 of 2 (22 messages) | 1 2 ...Last page » |