Search the Forums
Options
Keywords search:


Search in Forum...

Search within...

Match...

Antiquity...

Player messages...

1. AGoT General Discussion
This is the place to talk about all elements of A Game of Thrones LCG.
Moderator: FFG NateFFGAntonffgjafferffgjoshFFGStuartGeckoGood_TravelerThe Spaniard Topics: 2364 | Posts: 35487
FAQ 3.4
Published on 11 October 2012 - 11:10:35

Can anybody explain this to me? I approve of different restricted lists for the two formats but WTF? TftE restricted for Joust? Conclave restricted for Melee? Furies except Stag off the list for Melee? I don't get it.

This forum hates signatures

Page 1 of 3 (38 messages) 1 2 3 ...Last page »
Reply #1 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 18:39:44

Also, I really would've liked to see the whole "loses all keywords" mess addressed.

This forum hates signatures

Reply #2 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 18:51:56

I quite like the Fury change. Makes for more dynamic melee. I'm on the fence about Stag remaining on the list. It does have the potential for the biggest swing in power and Bara doesn't really need any help when it comes to gaining power.

Without Signature

Reply #3 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 18:59:42
2
61

Ratatoskr said:

Can anybody explain this to me?
Not definitively. You'd need to ask FFG.

Ratatoskr said:

TftE restricted for Joust?
"We have updated the Joust restricted list, adding Threat from the East. This was done to put a check upon some powerful hand denial combinations that have emerged, without completely removing these combos from the environment."

Ratatoskr said:

Conclave restricted for Melee? Furies except Stag off the list for Melee?
I would assume this is based on the "rush" emphasis in Melee. The Conclave tends to be cheaper on average in a Melee deck. The Fury plots, whose text is more likely to be applicable against someone in melee, encourage a level of interaction and deeper decision tree for challenges in Melee that they do not in Joust, but the "take control" for the Stag plot remains problematic for different reasons.

There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'

 - Dave Berry

Reply #4 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 19:23:47

ktom said:


"We have updated the Joust restricted list, adding Threat from the East. This was done to put a check upon some powerful hand denial combinations that have emerged, without completely removing these combos from the game"

 

Ah, that combo that the winner of that tourney in Spain employed. I had forgotten that. Still not sure about Conclave. Have they really had that much of an impact in Melee? Well, I don't really play Melee so I wouldn't know.

This forum hates signatures

Reply #5 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 19:39:26

Ratatoskr said:

Also, I really would've liked to see the whole "loses all keywords" mess addressed.

Which mess is that? Sorry, haven't been following the meta closely lately.

Reply #6 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 19:45:58
2
61

I'm surprised no one is mentioning that Melee will now officially be Swiss-paired.

There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'

 - Dave Berry

Reply #7 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 19:50:38

http://www.fantasyflightgames.com/edge_foros_discusion.asp?efid=18&efcid=4&efidt=712917 

alpha5099 said:

Ratatoskr said:

 

Also, I really would've liked to see the whole "loses all keywords" mess addressed.

 

 

Which mess is that? Sorry, haven't been following the meta closely lately.

“And Balerion… his fire was as black as his scales, his wings so vast that whole towns were swallowed up in their shadow when he passed overhead.”
Reply #8 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 21:52:26

They added "missing" traits, but still didnt correct the other errors like "Dohraki"
I definitely approve of power-claim events on the melee list, it'll really change things up.  Not sure I like Fury of the Stag being restricted but the rest of the Furies being playable; I acknowledge that it can be more game changing than the others, but it seems pretty unfair to Bara.  And BotS unrestricted for melee?  It was added to the list for a good reason…

The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.  -Terry Pratchett

Reply #9 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 22:10:33

 did they take it down or something their support page is blank right now..

Without Signature

Reply #10 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 22:22:05
2
61

Skowza said:

 Not sure I like Fury of the Stag being restricted but the rest of the Furies being playable; I acknowledge that it can be more game changing than the others, but it seems pretty unfair to Bara.
Possibly, but Bara tends to have an edge as the best House for rush in Melee, anyway. A little extra hobble for Bara in melee, based on their stated presumptions, makes some sense.

There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'

 - Dave Berry

Reply #11 | Published on 11 October 2012 - 23:41:28

I'd like to thank whoever spearheaded the change in tie breaker rule. The old rule caused people with top notch SoS who didn't play anyone in the 4-2 bracket to miss the cut over people with low SoS that happened to beat one person in the 4-2 bracket, which seemed fundamentally wrong to me. I'm glad this has been changed and that people will be rewarded for better performances.

Without Signature

Reply #12 | Published on 12 October 2012 - 03:51:44

ktom said:

I'm surprised no one is mentioning that Melee will now officially be Swiss-paired.

Yeah, I liked the TFTE change but this might be my favorite change of this round of FAQ/Tourney Rules.

Without Signature
Reply #13 | Published on 12 October 2012 - 06:37:29

Actually, I really like what they did with the separate restricted lists for Melee and Joust. The cards behave very differently in those two environments, so it's only logical that different cards are restricted.

Have to love the way they are trying to now use the restricted list to stop Melee from degenerating into a very short rush competition. That's what most of the restrictions there were aimed at, I think. Including the one on Fury of the Stag, which is a really easy way to obtain a huge chunk of power by stealing a power-laden character from Targ/Martell. None of the other Furies work as an accelerant, so it's logical that they are not restricted. 

Similarly I think that Conclave and TMP were restricted together to stop Conclave-Rush decks like the ones that dominated GenCon 2011? Those haven't really taken a hit by many of the previous restrictions/erratas, and can be pretty damn fast, since non-kneeling (We Light the Way, Game of Thrones,  renown characters are key in Melee.

I think the attempt at trying to slow down Melee and make it less Rush-y is best seen in the restrictions of Make an Example and Superior claim… coupled with the un-restrction of Burning on the Sands, which is a pretty brutal card in stopping another player from winning in Melee. That one speaks volumes.

Seems like FFG doesn't want Melee to be too fast. I like it. 

Threat from the East looks to be purely aimed at the deck that won in Spain. I guess FFG didn't like any deck that leaves your opponent with 1 card in hand at the beginning of the game to exist… this is probably related to wanting to keep KotHH viable? Since it was able to win in a field of ~80 players, it was probably pretty competitive to boot…

The added traits are probably to ensure that all character/location cards have at least *some* trait? Did a quick search through all the locations, I think everything else has one. Not sure if they missed any characters.

Just guessing though, naturally.

Without Signature

Reply #14 | Published on 12 October 2012 - 09:53:09
0
0

Yeah - agree with drakey here. I am a rush player at heart, but melee was pushing the envelope of late. too much non interaction - dropping a whole chain of events to basically put power on cards off of one challenge. Just getting a hair too fast to be fun. Thsi should reign it in nciely

And Fury of the Stag HAS to stay restricted in melee. its an auto inculde otherwise and probably way too swingy in the format. barathon does NOT need the help in the high target environment.

 

Good FAQ. Feels like the game is (mostly) ina pretty good spot rigth now. still don't think the maester thing si working, but "whatever" at this point.

Without signature

Reply #15 | Published on 12 October 2012 - 10:25:51
2
61

Stag Lord said:

Yeah - agree with drakey here. I am a rush player at heart, but melee was pushing the envelope of late. too much non interaction - dropping a whole chain of events to basically put power on cards off of one challenge. Just getting a hair too fast to be fun. Thsi should reign it in nciely

And Fury of the Stag HAS to stay restricted in melee. its an auto inculde otherwise and probably way too swingy in the format. barathon does NOT need the help in the high target environment.

The next step in this logic, of course, is that by not restricting the (non-Bara) Furies in Melee, you are inviting more interaction, or at least more choices for more interaction.

There is a fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness.'

 - Dave Berry

Page 1 of 3 (38 messages) 1 2 3 ...Last page »

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS