My group has nothing but love for WFRP3.  We've been playing it since it came out, on and off with other GMs in our group running a variety of games, and are getting back to it today with our first session from TEW.  I played 1st edition when it initially came out and prefer WFRP3 to it by a wide margin.

Mark

Necrozius said:

Pretty much ditto with everything that N said here, to include playtesting after the initial Core Set release. I was the first to sign up and run the demo when the Core Set was "pre-released" to game stores.  I played both 1st and second editions and loved them.  I like 3rd edition WFRP more than either of those previous editions, as both a GM and a player (although I mostly GM).  It is definitely more evocative of a "story" RPG than a "number-crunching" game which the previous editions favored. I dislike pure story RPGs are being too loose and nebulous. WFRP3 has a great mix of structure, yet free-flowing cinematics and ability for the GM to manipulate the game to fit the story.

All that said, even if I didn't like the game overall, I don't see the point of going onto forums and ranting about the game over and over.  For example, I thought that FFG made a major mistake re-tooling their Star Wars KCG to be 1vs1 competitive. I thought it would be much better done as a co-op card game.  After a few rational posts related to that, I merely stopped visiting those forums as it held no interest to me any more. There was no constructive reason for me to start posting rants about whether or not they destroyed the game. Simply, it no longer appealed to me, but that does not mean it doesn't appeal to others.