| Register Now | |
| My Points | |
| My Games | |
| Page 3 of 3 (40 messages) | « First page... 2 3 |
Why would I bleff if this decks are already things of the past and meta is well at the moment in our country? If you don't know what empire deck looked like before restrictions then I can't help you. Funny thing is some people here think that I'm trolling when I support FFG decisions about restrictions while I think that those whining about them are either empire players or trolls themselves :P
Without Signature
There's no need for this discussion to turn harsh. Let's keep in mind there are people from very different gaming environments here, and what some take for granted, because they get to play more and have more lively discussions in RL and on their national forums, others only have a vague idea about. Still, while for example one pre-restriction Verena deck might have differed from the other in details, it is safe to assume they shared key elements (like Verena/Will/Long Winter, Hemmler, Rodrik's, Derricksburg), and these key elements were what made them powerful. Whether one included Chain Lightning and the other didn't isn't that important, so deck lists shouldn't be needed. Let's also keep in mind that one gaming environment might find one strategy or faction to be superior that doesn't do as well in another environment, and we should be careful with absolute and categorical statements.
Maybe it would be a good idea to have a thread outlining common builds and strategies, so that everyone's roughly on the same page when people say their DE control lost against Chaos rush.
Winvasion - The Warhammer: Invasion podcast
The Rules Summary with card mouseovers. My deckbox page with all the decks from the news articles.
Virgo said:
Why would I bleff if this decks are already things of the past and meta is well at the moment in our country? If you don't know what empire deck looked like before restrictions then I can't help you. Funny thing is some people here think that I'm trolling when I support FFG decisions about restrictions while I think that those whining about them are either empire players or trolls themselves :P
If you can't prove what you said, then I'll consider you bluffed, then I won't trust and reply any of what you say
I don't know why you need to bluff, maybe you just wanna show you're smarter or better than others, like a boss.
And yes, I think you're whining and trolls yourself. Because, thanks God I'm not a Empire player, I used to play Dwarf Reclaim deck and now I play DE control deck.
Without Signature
Mallumo said:
There's no need for this discussion to turn harsh. Let's keep in mind there are people from very different gaming environments here, and what some take for granted, because they get to play more and have more lively discussions in RL and on their national forums, others only have a vague idea about. Still, while for example one pre-restriction Verena deck might have differed from the other in details, it is safe to assume they shared key elements (like Verena/Will/Long Winter, Hemmler, Rodrik's, Derricksburg), and these key elements were what made them powerful. Whether one included Chain Lightning and the other didn't isn't that important, so deck lists shouldn't be needed. Let's also keep in mind that one gaming environment might find one strategy or faction to be superior that doesn't do as well in another environment, and we should be careful with absolute and categorical statements.
Maybe it would be a good idea to have a thread outlining common builds and strategies, so that everyone's roughly on the same page when people say their DE control lost against Chaos rush.
Like this post(if there has Like button).
This is the real disscuss. and thank you for your explanation.
But Rodrik's and Derricksburg restricted on last FAQ.
Without Signature
The reason I asked for the to 8 Polish deck lists to begin with was to see how many of them were Verena centered Empire decks. I feel highly visible tournament results feed discussions in the forums which in turn fosters a more active community. At the very least it would put a lot of these discussions sited with conjecture to rest.
Even if the actual lists aren't available it would be nice to know the faction and general deck theme of top 8 in the largest WHI tournament ever.
LiouKen said:
And yes, I think you're whining and trolls yourself.
You troll yourself, no s at the end, it's not the third person. Duh!
Kaine82 said:
Even if the actual lists aren't available it would be nice to know the faction and general deck theme of top 8 in the largest WHI tournament ever.
http://warhammer-inwazja.pl/index.php?p=5&&t=368
And yes I know I sucked badly at this tournament. First big tournament outside of my city and no so good deck and those are the results
Without Signature
Looking at the tournaments from 2012-03-27, it's awesome to see that top 6 are all different races. I guess there are a lot of players that are interested in the HE decks from Fortep and Arczi.
Verena should be epic spell it is clearly too powerful (and just annoying and funbraking) for it's current status.
grille said:
Looking at the tournaments from 2012-03-27, it's awesome to see that top 6 are all different races. I guess there are a lot of players that are interested in the HE decks from Fortep and Arczi.
Where can I find these HE decks? Thx
| Page 3 of 3 (40 messages) | « First page... 2 3 |