Okay, we've probably all ran into this either online or in person.  You know the type (heck, maybe you ARE the type, LOL): Know-it-All Magic:The Gathering gamer who can't stomach the mere possibility that another new card-game is in town (Warhammer:Invasion) and is stealing (gasp!) a good chunk of attention away from his or her precious Magic.

What's sad is that there's plenty of room for a huge variety of card games out here.  There's no need for any Magic fan to consider Warhammer: Invasion as a threat - they are both different games that fill a different niche.  Though these former (or current) Magic players will try to convince you that Warhammer:Invasion is nothing more than just Magic with different clothes on.  (Something we can all agree isn't the case. Similarities abound but there are far more differences than similarities.)

My suggestions for dealing with this particularly annoying type of gamer:

1. Point out the specific differences between the games rather than the shallow similarities

2. Showcase the factors that make an LCG far less expensive than a CCG

3. Explain that their beloved Magic isn't going anywhere any more than the newer Warhammer:Invasion isn't going away any time soon, either 

4. You could always just not bother even trying to go through the hassle of dealing with this particularly annoying brand of gaming elitism

5. If a disparaging know-it-all Magic fanboy comes around to denigrate W:I, just toss out some Black Lotus color copies and watch them scurry!  It's fun!  ;)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately the reality is that there will always be a subset of gamers for any hugely popular game that feel that only their game and their game alone can occupy its niche in its own genre.  You're probably not going to convince these gamers otherwise - they're a lot like the police horse in a downtown area with blinders on - they're probably never going to be able to see past their personal "blinders" to realize how awesome, cool, and unique this NEW card game is. 

Wytefang said:

Well said! And here's what I'd personally add to those great points:

1. Specifically mention the Capital mechanics and the three zones: their individual HP and the nuances of the distribution of power between them. Oh, and the fact there's NO mana screw and even cards you can't play at a certain time can be used as Developments.

2. In the UK, a playset of the Core Set will set you back less than the cost of a single box of the newest MTG expansion.

3. Nothing more to add.

4. But for every ten rejections you get, if even a single MTG fanatic converts to this delcious new LCG you end up with a new opponent. Do this eighty times, and you have yourself a league :D Of course, I highly doubt I'll be able to find eighty of these players, but you never know ;)

5. Haha, just pretend to have pulled one of them out of a pack of Zendikar, apparently it's already happened because of their "inserting hidden treasures" into Zendikar packs" gimmick :P

I actually sit back with my former pro-tour M:TG roomate and LCG convert and laugh. Online I simply point out the differences while trying not to denigrate the important role Magic played in TCG's.

"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."

Yeah, I get caught up in trying too hard to put Magic down in the more mundane slot that I have personally reserved for it - I've always thought it way too over-hyped but the other issue I've had with that game is that (in my experience - key phrase here) the die-hard MTG fans are almost always elitist jerkwads...  I can't say I've had too many positive experiences with Magic fanboys.  Sigh.

Any person that plays, extensively, any ONE game over others, and clamours and yells "this game is better than your game!" to the world. THAT is the elitist.

Its ok to like a game. It is just incredibly frustratingly curious how SO many people play JUST ONE GAME...

Death to the "one game player" mentality. Play moar games naoh!

 Personally I like the fact that Magic players don't like this game cause I don't enjoy M:TG. Can wait to get my copy of this, it should arrive tomorrow, maybe Saturday, hopefully. The comparisons to M:TG are annoying because for people like me they put you off W:I because what's the point if its just, as they say, a Magic-clone with a Warhammer body. I always preferred WOTC's other card game any way, the Star Wars TCG :) Anyways, glad i read all of the FFG material and the PDF rulebook and came to my own conclusions and bought the game. 

vermillian said:

Yeah. I have often to talk to people, asked about boardgames, just saying "Settlers", what is extremly annoying.

I just bring up that WoW Card Game is what Magic has been trying to be for YEARS....then they go storm off into a corner or out the store to smoke. Problem solved and you get to laugh at a grown man/nerd rage. The WoW Card game sells beter than magic at my store currently. 

But I have moved on to LCGs after call of Cthulhu. I like the simple mechanics yet hard to master tactics and strategy for the Warhammer LCG. Eric Lang is the master of choice he obviously studied the fan favorite Settlers of Catan. And even if not then he is living proof the great minds think alike.

I dont get what you want to say with the two last sentences.

Me?

I am saying Settlers is a great game for the same reason that Invasion is. They both are simple mechanics but require many tough choices to win. I am saying Mr. Lang has learned that you don't need complex games with tons of special rules to make a game tactical. 

darkkami said:

That is very true...you don't need to go further than the fan favourite "Go" to see how complexity does not necessarily equate to tactical brilliance for a game.

Poor Wytefang... BGG is hard to chew these days, isn't it? ;o)

I've read many of your tries to convince those M:TG players, that WH:I isn't just a M:TG clone. Thumbs up for this endurance!

If you only have ever played one CCG game you will compare every other CCG game to it. They lack the proper references to be able to see it as a unique game. It does have some strong similarities to Magic... they are just completely dwarfed by the numerous differences.

They both have a fantasy theme // One is well thought out and comprised of a coherent mythos and the other is a hodgpodge universe with only slimmest of threads holding the pieces together.

They both involve inflicting unblocked damage to win the game // One is a set amount of damage in total while the other is a set number of regions with a number of damage that each player has direct control over.

They both involve personalities that operate as your main method of attacking and defending // every other part of this is different from a mechnical and gameplay perspective. One their is no restriction to using a personality the turn it comes into play, if it attacks or defends during one combat there is nothing to prevent it from doing so during the next, damage is persistent, the characters themselves control not just your ability to attack or defend but your ability to gather  resources and draw cards.

"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."

Killer Power said:

Thanks for the support - they don't bother me all that much.  They're just annoyingly arrogant (as they always seem to be) about their favorite game.  ::: shrugs ::::  I see it for what it is and I'm okay with it.

 Just point out that it took them how long to come up with a quest system, allies system, and trap system. Then point out the WoW TCG was first to introduce landfall. WH Invasion was first to introduce the quests and allies, and Yugioh was first to introduce traps. Then ask who is coat tailing who now? LOL Magic actually had to redo how they ran the game because of the pressure from other games. 

As Wizards said "Magic needed a new look" and M10 was finally IN MY OPINION what Magic should have been all these years. The Zennedar (sp) set has amazing mechanics...but the ART oh the ART... MY EYES THEY BLEED. 

lol. I've heard of some of the "new" mechanics (well since I quit last millennium) and it sounds like a game I'd be interested in picking up, except for FFG's LCG games. I just can't justify spending that kind of money on a game when I have strategically rich, but investment light alternatives available to me.

"I am the Prince of Dorne. Men seek my favor."